Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shaposhnik@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: shaposhnik@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <9FBB7B72-DD0B-452E-9B2A-EBB1BDBDE87A@hortonworks.com>
References: <CB8CD802.2D12E%Milind.Bhandarkar@emc.com>
	<F0644DC2-2F79-437E-9086-FEF9C2B48D4C@hortonworks.com>
	<4F67AB88.1060001@apache.org>
	<CADY20s7o56YwszGy7+96yrjzRGxDu3nVSXGaNJ21U-LuQ1bRgQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F67BED9.5040908@apache.org>
	<9FBB7B72-DD0B-452E-9B2A-EBB1BDBDE87A@hortonworks.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:44:38 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CA+ULb+srPaDwhxEDyo8oWoCkZx0zq-BoAgTwXZJkuJVD-FbLRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Naming of Hadoop releases
From: Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@apache.org>
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Arun, let me answer both of your questions in the same reply:

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Arun C Murthy <acm@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> So, let me ask again - is there anyone willing to step up and fix security in branch-0.22?
>
> If not, and I haven't seen evidence to the contrary for a very long time now, IMHO this discussion is moot.

Which discussion? The one that I'm interested in is a very simple
issue -- should
we reserve the version slot 2.X.Y or not. That has very little to do
with the current
state of security.

> Roman & Milind: asking again - would you guys be willing to step up and fix 0.22 to be more
> reasonable as a hadoop-2 candidate i.e. fix/validate security?

Sure. I might end up doing some work on within the Bigtop framework.
That said, I can't
really give you the deadline as of now. Hence my desire to separate
these 2 discussions.

Thanks,
Roman.