From general-return-4949-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 20 16:20:19 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7754597F6 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97274 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2012 16:20:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97179 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2012 16:20:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97163 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2012 16:20:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:20:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:20:11 +0000 Received: by yenq4 with SMTP id q4so283842yen.35 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:19:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=+dnVTBWOefFQcI3e2ig1TrUALjF42HoUrfos8VeF0wk=; b=cz9aTG9GaWYrRfpIQrTZhm5KfR9PQEPq6/7fceupqOhc8F9/83YOML1KItsbGhk9WC eBPacd4xjGReFgYMWB8W+Zbc8gYoLoc5cu8dW0l60SKKmE8XaGRB48h798BdilpjhJlW r/ojD1vH/SvQxlMbGA0tFSyXfom59G/K56ZFO7d9nBGDLnwsxdFwWTOkWo6BuVZ+0eV0 FuXFuk8nsWqnDEXo/ebELWl+Qp5dL+Nr0fwnpl9aO5MqFoE22Z8+dJ2QJrb1vyw7OKZJ 9xo7ZaX+1g8QwP74Lc5ayhJ3LuBX+mrfRCfea8N+bSkZye1PSbPZ7J7xmFxDChzkt0IF rjRw== Received: by 10.68.125.134 with SMTP id mq6mr2700483pbb.74.1332260389849; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.72] (76-253-2-148.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.253.2.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p10sm1592909pbo.55.2012.03.20.09.19.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:19:48 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x From: Hitesh Shah In-Reply-To: <5CB2BB9C-A55E-46CE-AC11-FAC07FFF90F4@hortonworks.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:19:46 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0DEB0A13-2B3D-4448-8DC9-34D5518BCB2C@hortonworks.com> References: <5CB2BB9C-A55E-46CE-AC11-FAC07FFF90F4@hortonworks.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmaNjf1E+d+jrmbt0Jvwp82UNcPHj2J0OdU+2/4PBczcxCbK7OWNeilxAe3ib7TjTG12bxO X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 3, 4, 2, 1 -- Hitesh=20 On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: >=20 > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave = a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. = 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively = postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.=20 > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. >=20 > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. >=20 > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. >=20 > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). >=20 > The vote will run the normal 7 days. >=20 > thanks, > Arun >=20 > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >=20