Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-1.x.x off branch-0.20-security
From: Eric Baldeschwieler <eric14@hortonworks.com>
In-Reply-To: <375B0DE9-FC31-4217-A394-8EE19A2A0764@hortonworks.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:43:57 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <87952677-A766-4E19-877E-5121E05A0468@hortonworks.com>
References: <8919911656268712218@unknownmsgid>
 <375B0DE9-FC31-4217-A394-8EE19A2A0764@hortonworks.com>
To: general@hadoop.apache.org

+1 (non-binding)

Let's ship 1.0.0 off 0.20.205.*

I think this will be great for the project.

Arun, since you called the vote, can you clarify exactly what version of =
the 20.2xx.x line will be renamed or originally released as exactly what =
1.0.x version?  It seems like following versions will take care of =
themselves, but let's vote on a specific action. =20


On Nov 15, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:

> +1
>=20
> My preference is to call it 1.0 and not as 1.6 to reflect 0.20.206.=20
>=20
>=20
> On Nov 15, 2011, at 8:22 PM, Arun Murthy <acm@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>=20
>> Please vote on naming 'future' releases off branch-0.20-security =
(with
>> both security & append) as hadoop-1.x.x.
>>=20
>> We should also rename branch-0.20-security as branch-1.x.x.
>>=20
>> I propose we use the common 3-part major, minor (compatible, newer
>> features) and sub-minor (bug fixes) scheme as suggested by Doug in =
the
>> previous thread.
>>=20
>> The vote will run the normal 5 days.
>>=20
>> thanks,
>> Arun