hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantin Shvachko <shv.had...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-1.x.x off branch-0.20-security
Date Sat, 19 Nov 2011 00:30:36 GMT
Doesn't having trunk on lesser version than a branch make Hadoop
versioning more confusing?
People were asking for consistent non-confusing versioning schema.
Why don't we instead call a vote on your initial suggestion lately
clarified by Matt?
I got a feeling many are in favor of it.

--Konstantin

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Arun C Murthy <acm@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Nope, just change the version number of releases off this branch.
>
> Trunk continues to be trunk. 0.23 or 0.24 etc. etc. whatever we choose to call them come
off trunk.
>
> This is about one branch only.
>
> Arun
>
> On Nov 17, 2011, at 7:29 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
>
>> Let me repeat. By renaming ONLY 0.20.security to 1.0
>> you are replacing Hadoop-trunk with this branch.
>> Is that the intention of the rename?
>> Are we switching to the security branch as the new trunk?
>>
>> --Konstantin
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Eric Yang <eric818@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Owen O'Malley <owen@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>> +1 for release future 2xx releases as 1.x.y.
>>>>
>>>> I believe the right mapping is:
>>>> rename branch-0.20-security to branch-1
>>>> copy branch-0.20-security-205 to branch-1.0
>>>>
>>>> Then the 1.0.x releases will come off of the branch-1.0 and branch-1 will
>>>> be the upcoming 1.1.x releases.
>>>>
>>>> -- Owen
>>>>
>>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message