hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <Milind.Bhandar...@emc.com>
Subject Re: Hadoop 0.22/HBase 0.92 package repos are now available
Date Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:10:55 GMT
[CC'ng Pig-dev].

In terms of interest, what is the community more interested in seeing work
with Hadoop 0.22 ? Pig 0.8.x or Pig.0.9.

I took a look at pig 0.9 added features:

New parser (still has corner cases)
UDFs in languages other than Java
Macros
Hcatalog support

As far as existing installations are concerned, my belief is that these
features do not make a very compelling case for pig 0.9 to be compatible
immediately with Hadoop 0.22, and pig 0.8.x makes more sense.

What do people think ?

- Milind

---
Milind Bhandarkar
Greenplum Labs, EMC
(Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and
do not necessarily represent the views of any organization, past or
present, the author might be affiliated with.)



On 9/29/11 1:53 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <cos@apache.org> wrote:

>Alos, if Pig 0.8.2 or 0.9 is getting released soon it'd critical to have
>deploy patch from PIG-1799 getting committed because at the moment Pid
>doesn't
>deploy correct test artifacts to maven.
>
>Cos
>
>P.S. I think this becomes too specific of a discussion and it might find a
>better place on one (or more) of the development lists.
>
>On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:45AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:55 PM, J. Rottinghuis
>><jrottinghuis@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Will have to give BigTop a try...
>> 
>> Let me know if you have any feedback.
>> 
>> > With the patch for ¨¨https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2277
>>applied
>> > Pig (0.8 for now, and 0.9 in the works) will compile and run against
>>0.22 as
>> > well.
>> 
>> I'm a little bit puzzled by the situation with Pig. It sounds like you
>>need both
>> Pig 0.8.X and Pig 0.9.X be compilable and usable against .22. Bigtop
>>currently
>> targets Pig 0.9.0 (since we had troubles compiling Pig 0.8 cleanly)
>> but if there's
>> a plan to have a release of Pig 0.8.X that would work with .22 I'd love
>>to
>> jump on that bandwagon. Any plans on releasing 0.8.2 ?
>> 
>> As for Pig 9 -- will you be pursuing the shims strategy with your patch?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>

Mime
View raw message