hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <Milind.Bhandar...@emc.com>
Subject Re: abandoning 22 - was: Content request for 0.20.205 Sustaining Release
Date Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:17:09 GMT
Never mind. It was an oblique reference to client not writing to a file
for a long time, so hdfs recovering the lease. (RM=client, release=file,
recovery=transferring RM role. :-)

- milind

On 9/9/11 2:58 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <cos@apache.org> wrote:

>On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:55PM, Milind.Bhandarkar@emc.com wrote:
>> But did he do the lease recovery (for more info: HDFS-265) ? I haven
>>seen
>> the initiation of lease recovery by Konst, but haven't seen acks.
>
>I am not sure I follow you, Milind. HDFS_265 has been in since 0.21. Are
>you
>referring to some new development that I might've missed?
>
>Cos
>
>> - milind 
>> 
>> On 9/9/11 2:13 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <cos@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> >KOnstantin has stepped forward a couple of days ago ;)
>> >
>> >On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:08PM, Milind.Bhandarkar@emc.com wrote:
>> >> Has anyone seen the RM for 0.22 lately ?
>> >> 
>> >> - milind
>> >> 
>> >> On 9/9/11 1:46 PM, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> >On Sep 9, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Eli Collins wrote:
>> >> >> The release manager - not the developers - are responsible for
and
>> >> >> have the final say as to what patches get merge to their branch.
>> >> >
>> >> >That is simply false.  At no time is any individual responsible for
>> >> >any part of Apache subversion, no matter how obscure the branch.
>> >> >No RM has the final say on anything other than their own work.
>> >> >That is, they can choose not to produce a release candidate.
>> >> >Furthermore, at no time whatsoever does any person "own" the job
>> >> >of being RM -- there can be five active RMs on a single branch,
>> >> >each producing release candidates based on what is in subversion
>> >> >at the particular time that they decide to tag and build.
>> >> >
>> >> >> If the RM wants all this work they need to either corral the
>> >>developers
>> >> >> to do the merging or do the merging themselves. In short, it's
>>their
>> >> >> responsibility to get people to invest in the branch.
>> >> >
>> >> >That is true of anyone, on or off the PMC -- not just the RM.
>> >> >
>> >> >....Roy
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> 
>> >
>> 
>


Mime
View raw message