hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <Milind.Bhandar...@emc.com>
Subject Re: abandoning 22 - was: Content request for 0.20.205 Sustaining Release
Date Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:55:10 GMT
But did he do the lease recovery (for more info: HDFS-265) ? I haven seen
the initiation of lease recovery by Konst, but haven't seen acks.

- milind 

On 9/9/11 2:13 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <cos@apache.org> wrote:

>KOnstantin has stepped forward a couple of days ago ;)
>
>On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:08PM, Milind.Bhandarkar@emc.com wrote:
>> Has anyone seen the RM for 0.22 lately ?
>> 
>> - milind
>> 
>> On 9/9/11 1:46 PM, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
>> 
>> >On Sep 9, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Eli Collins wrote:
>> >> The release manager - not the developers - are responsible for and
>> >> have the final say as to what patches get merge to their branch.
>> >
>> >That is simply false.  At no time is any individual responsible for
>> >any part of Apache subversion, no matter how obscure the branch.
>> >No RM has the final say on anything other than their own work.
>> >That is, they can choose not to produce a release candidate.
>> >Furthermore, at no time whatsoever does any person "own" the job
>> >of being RM -- there can be five active RMs on a single branch,
>> >each producing release candidates based on what is in subversion
>> >at the particular time that they decide to tag and build.
>> >
>> >> If the RM wants all this work they need to either corral the
>>developers
>> >> to do the merging or do the merging themselves. In short, it's their
>> >> responsibility to get people to invest in the branch.
>> >
>> >That is true of anyone, on or off the PMC -- not just the RM.
>> >
>> >....Roy
>> >
>> >
>> 
>


Mime
View raw message