hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantin Boudnik <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: abandoning 22 - was: Content request for 0.20.205 Sustaining Release
Date Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:28:50 GMT
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 06:17PM, Milind.Bhandarkar@emc.com wrote:
> Never mind. It was an oblique reference to client not writing to a file
> for a long time, so hdfs recovering the lease. (RM=client, release=file,
> recovery=transferring RM role. :-)

Very clever ;) I don't think there's a competition. There's room for more, I
am sure!

Cos

> - milind
> 
> On 9/9/11 2:58 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <cos@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:55PM, Milind.Bhandarkar@emc.com wrote:
> >> But did he do the lease recovery (for more info: HDFS-265) ? I haven
> >>seen
> >> the initiation of lease recovery by Konst, but haven't seen acks.
> >
> >I am not sure I follow you, Milind. HDFS_265 has been in since 0.21. Are
> >you
> >referring to some new development that I might've missed?
> >
> >Cos
> >
> >> - milind 
> >> 
> >> On 9/9/11 2:13 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <cos@apache.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >KOnstantin has stepped forward a couple of days ago ;)
> >> >
> >> >On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:08PM, Milind.Bhandarkar@emc.com wrote:
> >> >> Has anyone seen the RM for 0.22 lately ?
> >> >> 
> >> >> - milind
> >> >> 
> >> >> On 9/9/11 1:46 PM, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> >On Sep 9, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Eli Collins wrote:
> >> >> >> The release manager - not the developers - are responsible
for and
> >> >> >> have the final say as to what patches get merge to their branch.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >That is simply false.  At no time is any individual responsible
for
> >> >> >any part of Apache subversion, no matter how obscure the branch.
> >> >> >No RM has the final say on anything other than their own work.
> >> >> >That is, they can choose not to produce a release candidate.
> >> >> >Furthermore, at no time whatsoever does any person "own" the job
> >> >> >of being RM -- there can be five active RMs on a single branch,
> >> >> >each producing release candidates based on what is in subversion
> >> >> >at the particular time that they decide to tag and build.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> If the RM wants all this work they need to either corral the
> >> >>developers
> >> >> >> to do the merging or do the merging themselves. In short,
it's
> >>their
> >> >> >> responsibility to get people to invest in the branch.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >That is true of anyone, on or off the PMC -- not just the RM.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >....Roy
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> 
> >> >
> >> 
> >
> 

Mime
View raw message