hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Update on hadoop-0.23
Date Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:34:20 GMT
This time it seems easy to split the difference here.

- Sufficient interest in Bigtop so announcements and discussions can/should go to general@.*

- There is no need to (and a request not to) inject exhortations to participate in Bigtop
into random other topics on general@, such as status reports by another project or group.
Simply create new threads to discuss Bigtop matters.

* - Seems to me a community effort to qualify an integrated stack top to bottom is a good
thing, but I question doing this for 0.22, which nobody is going to use much, or so I hear.

Best regards,

    - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)

>From: Konstantin Shvachko <shv.hadoop@gmail.com>
>To: general@hadoop.apache.org
>Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 2:23 AM
>Subject: Re: Update on hadoop-0.23
>On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler
><eric14@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> Hi Doug, Jeff, Roman
>> I'd like to request that folks take bigtop project discussions onto
>> the bigtop lists and don't greet status reports on general@hadoop
>I am personally very interested in the results of testing of 0.22 with
>BigTop, or other tools, or without any tools.
>So I'd like to ask (rather than request) good people to continue
>posting your findings on the general@hadoop list.
>Eric, thank you for your continuous contributions to Apache Hadoop.
>I also think that general@hadoop is the right place to discuss
>inter-project issues like making HBase, Pig, Hive,
>working on Hadoop 0.22 and 0.23. Where else?
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message