Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77F344CDA for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 04:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74700 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2011 04:16:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74250 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2011 04:16:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74242 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2011 04:16:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 04:16:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 04:16:33 +0000 Received: by vxd2 with SMTP id 2so5218343vxd.35 for ; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 21:16:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=yZ+Zf/UF+Dy8WQ6Mfn5Rh96u6B5x9uV6zikSYpQdZIE=; b=ULhfsTs7AnWsdx/NKYnAjCDl4aDqvOFV434ZE/eicc2rxctw1Q0tSnbgq6br5CbedS y/h8gsFUKOgOaarvWJT5fbYH7cosvaCClcKT2M0ZLGks3fNtBocoro7H1KAuokFlEuRb 0lXBLqQs+5g5wN+ykJZNYdTTpY3yRSLyVwoF0= Received: by 10.52.186.133 with SMTP id fk5mr3123140vdc.184.1309666572129; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 21:16:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.0.201] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f3sm2734203vbk.17.2011.07.02.21.16.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 02 Jul 2011 21:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 14:16:06 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <86816FA7-693A-46FA-82D9-4C7FA8E87DE2@Holsman.NET> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On Jul 2, 2011, at 7:38 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Abhishek Mehta = wrote: >=20 >> open and honest conversations on this thread/group, irrespective of >> whether one represents a company or apache, should be encouraged. >>=20 >=20 > Paradoxically, I partially agree with Ian on this. On the one hand, = it is > important to hear about alternatives in the same eco-system (and = alternative > approaches from other communities). That is a bit different from = Ian's > view. While I don't mind that technical alternatives get discussed, I do get = PO'd when the conversation goes into why product X is better than Y, or when = someone makes claims that are incorrect because some 'customer' told = them and stuff like that. If we can keep it at architecture/approaches instead of why a certain = product is better than go right ahead. >=20 > Where I agree with him is that discussions should not be in the form = of > simple breast beating. Discussions should be driven by data and = experience. > All data and experience are of equal value if they represent quality > thought. The only place that company names should figure in this is = as a > bookmark so you can tell which product/release has the characteristic = under > consideration. >=20 >=20 >> ... And in that sense we all owe ASF and the hadoop community (and = not any >> one company) an equal amount of gratitude, humility and respect. >>=20 >=20 > This doesn't get said nearly enough.