Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D26DE3E0 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13070 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:19:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13025 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:19:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13016 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:19:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:19:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:19:41 +0000 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so757720eya.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 18:19:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.17.100 with SMTP id i76mr842992eei.67.1304558361545; Wed, 04 May 2011 18:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 18:19:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 18:19:21 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Entertaining concerns like a one-to-one > correspondence between commits and JIRA issues is bizarre in this > context. It's not about whether there's a jira, it's about whether the code was reviewed. We think code should be reviewed and vote on by the community before releasing it. That's how we've always rolled. Everyone agrees releases are too infrequent, that's not an excuse for steam rolling the community. Thanks, Eli