From general-return-3408-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 18:31:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49307365B for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 18:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 882 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 18:31:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 804 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 18:31:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 796 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 18:31:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 18:31:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.53.197] (HELO nm11-vm1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.53.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 18:31:17 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.192] by nm11.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 May 2011 18:30:56 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.152] by tm5.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 May 2011 18:30:56 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1035.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 May 2011 18:30:56 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 571912.32407.bm@omp1035.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 81724 invoked by uid 60001); 6 May 2011 18:30:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1304706656; bh=nLYtR+F48n9fTQTUSdQTevldMzCT+LnBFUga6wqaBJg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=b81z5lLvpZDBTF066ANrEc/1AVFFzUH1Z5NXbajDpXAeoNiTym7gxzDDMd1zk2T6Th8GajMy3wiaEVXXLHP7aPxWWOVcl5FOCPWdwblMywd7bEz9hKfGQbejWHcM1dA2xEAJooqyMx/qSyB2QH0MUN0Mtd10x7b5maK3JeJtEd8= Message-ID: <403388.69170.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 2QW48NwVM1mTOrH1rzIlZMnTggOlvIqwlzAHiEA5DyMw0OL vgV0eoB0Ztb.F6FvqOdYmTi5Cz5O0RgkKh1Y67k6VMc2tClOC6c8EWkKjDIQ 65gxWzIgtWiDV9iy0iFDaWPdiQi.T_DwHvDYLOkk0QxcJsxl1i9rf_FFDclB cOaVb.w3emyWpDGlMcwaSf.LzBJBIMiq3jBRuygQ5WcQAGTfxvjMdqG8DuRt qPhnxiy07biwC8npoII5fEvwIb6Y7ghXMiNVN4usk5rHTx800mKc3n4LOA3a eOa9taPZ_i5mkp8rH3TlA2oMt0ydlSRCDaGouAmHpjr7RNpY5bGvLlcrUoEC I5pmcIYWqGUmYJLnA8pmNDR3iWJFlKzBACq0ruIEEzoIPLUu1jmpdjFIxL7X rNmeqY2BJ2vF_80U21V1s7A3qlvc0t8LRxpWJVAofauq8O.yIDzGnchnvuyR MkL_94o0VZA-- Received: from [69.231.27.174] by web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 11:30:56 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/12.0.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.110.299900 Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 11:30:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4DC3E0FE.9060207@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > -we've been using Y! releases, and this brings their branch > back into the apache fold, meaning we can say "the official > Apache release of Apache Hadoop is something you can use in > production". And it is worth consideration that there is some measure of competition between Apache Hadoop and other projects, for example: http://twitter.com/#!/CurtMonash/status/66343706743160832 "@SethGrimes The @DataStax story is "Cassandra is mature, unlike Apache Hadoop, and hence will rescue Hadoop"" I've requested proof points..." and they are happy to exploit any perception of division, lack of forward progress, and such. Perhaps this is additional, and I pray sufficient, motivation to cease the proxy battles, bury the hatchet, etc. - Andy --- On Fri, 5/6/11, Steve Loughran wrote: > From: Steve Loughran > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Date: Friday, May 6, 2011, 4:52 AM > > Vote: +1 > > I'm a committer not PMC, so it's non binding. > > > Why: > -looks and works OK on my desktop > -we've been using Y! releases, and this brings their branch > back into the apache fold, meaning we can say "the official > Apache release of Apache Hadoop is something you can use in > production". > -I'm confident that the Y! team have tested this well. > > I understand Eli's concerns that putting stuff in there > that hasn't gone into trunk yet is danger. However, as the > team makes no guarantees of 100% compatibility between > releases, I don't think it's critical. It's just something > that needs to be addressed -which can be done after this > release has shipped. > > > -Steve > >