hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Holsman <had...@holsman.net>
Subject Re: Cleaning up documentation from website
Date Wed, 11 May 2011 22:36:16 GMT
I think we need a 0.18 doc's as some people are still running this.
other than that (and what is 'current'.. it should point to the stable release imho) I'm good
with it.
On May 12, 2011, at 6:20 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:

> We haven't cleaned up the version documentation in a long time:
> 
> lrwxrwxr-x  1 omalley   hadoop  11 May 11 20:14 current -> r0.20.203.0
> drwxrwsr-x  7 cutting   hadoop  29 Nov 24  2008 r0.14.4
> drwxrwsr-x  6 cutting   hadoop  22 Jan 23  2008 r0.15.2
> drwxrwsr-x  6 nigel     hadoop  22 Jan 23  2008 r0.15.3
> drwxrwsr-x  6 nigel     hadoop  28 Feb  8  2008 r0.16.0
> drwxrwsr-x  6 nigel     hadoop  36 Mar 14  2008 r0.16.1
> drwxrwsr-x  6 nigel     hadoop  36 Apr  3  2008 r0.16.2
> drwxrwsr-x  6 nigel     hadoop  36 Apr 17  2008 r0.16.3
> drwxrwsr-x  6 nigel     hadoop  36 May  9  2008 r0.16.4
> drwxrwsr-x  6 nigel     hadoop  42 May 21  2008 r0.17.0
> drwxrwsr-x  5 omalley   hadoop  42 Aug 20  2008 r0.17.1
> drwxrwsr-x  7 omalley   hadoop  43 Dec 11  2008 r0.17.2
> drwxrwsr-x  7 nigel     hadoop  51 Aug 22  2008 r0.18.0
> drwxrwsr-x  7 nigel     hadoop  51 Sep 18  2008 r0.18.1
> drwxrwsr-x  8 nigel     hadoop  52 Dec 11  2008 r0.18.2
> drwxrwsr-x  8 nigel     hadoop  52 Jan 30  2009 r0.18.3
> drwxrwsr-x  8 nigel     hadoop  58 Dec 11  2008 r0.19.0
> drwxrwsr-x  8 nigel     hadoop  58 Feb 24  2009 r0.19.1
> drwxrwsr-x  7 tomwhite  hadoop  57 Jun 30  2009 r0.19.2
> drwxrwsr-x  7 nigel     hadoop  63 Apr  9  2009 r0.20.0
> drwxrwsr-x  7 omalley   hadoop  64 Mar  1  2010 r0.20.1
> drwxrwxr-x  7 cdouglas  hadoop  63 Aug 24  2010 r0.20.2
> drwxrwxr-x  7 omalley   hadoop  63 May 11 20:11 r0.20.203.0
> drwxrwxr-x  7 tomwhite  hadoop  31 Aug 17  2010 r0.21.0
> 
> Other than the history of who made each of the releases, there isn't a lot of value there.
I propose that we trim this down to:
> 
> r0.20.2
> r0.20.203.0
> r0.21.0
> 
> Any concerns? If not, I'll clean up next week.
> 
> -- Owen


Mime
View raw message