hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Seigel <ja...@tynt.com>
Subject Re: Discussions - Re: [VOTE] Release candidate
Date Mon, 02 May 2011 20:59:48 GMT

I guess I am concerned as a user of hadoop that the only way to get an “endorsed” up-to-date
version of hadoop one has to abandon the community and “trust” a commercial release with
its special sauce.

I am just hoping that the community can put together a nice stable up-to-date patched version.
 That’d be nice.  It probably won’t change my commercial deploy, but it would give me
something to compare with :)

Just my $0.02 (CND)

On 2011-05-02, at 2:51 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:

> On 05/02/2011 01:05 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote:
>> As previously discussed, all parties are welcome to champion
>> altenative releases from Apache if they want to invest in making
>> Apache Hadoop better.
> I do not believe that different organizations should release their own
> versions of Hadoop posing as Apache releases.  If folks wish to release
> their own versions, then they should call them something else and
> release them themselves.  The Apache Hadoop project should create
> releases collaboratively, through an open process.  The standard means
> is to start a branch from trunk or a prior release and propose patches
> to that branch, one-by-one.  This candidate diverged sufficiently from
> this pattern that, for me, it doesn't qualify as a community release.
> Cheers,
> Doug

View raw message