hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Allen Wittenauer ...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting-
Date Fri, 13 May 2011 22:57:48 GMT

On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:

> But "distribution Z includes X" kind of implies the existence of some such
> that X != Y, Y != empty-set and X+Y = Z, at least in common usage.
> Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change?
> So doesn't this mean that your question reduces to the question of what
> happens when non-Apache changes are made to an Apache release?  And isn't
> that the definition of a derived work?

	Yup. Which is why I doubt *any* commercial entity can claim "includes Apache Hadoop" (including

View raw message