hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantin Boudnik <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules
Date Thu, 05 May 2011 16:36:25 GMT
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 23:40, Eli Collins <eli@cloudera.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Tom White <tom@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> One year ago (to the day!) Chris started a discussion about the
>> release manager role
>> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%3Ch2q1267dd3b1005041331r7d8f696di370a279ff605832f@mail.gmail.com%3E).
>> In light of today's disagreements, I think we should restart this
>> discussion and incorporate these rules into the bylaws, since it
>> formalizes our practices.
>> I'm happy to drive this. We could start by discussing Chris' proposal
>> (see clarifications in
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%3Ct2y1267dd3b1005051201h7116e4caud75673ac9d5128d6@mail.gmail.com%3E),
>> then when we get consensus we can put the document on the website.
>> (BTW does anyone know if the bylaws were checked into SVN anywhere?
>> These belong together.)
> Sounds good to me. I like Chris' proposal, he was clear that "nothing
> should be in (unreleased) 0.x that isn't also in trunk." so that may
> needs to be revisited if we want to be consistent with today's vote.
> I don't think the bylaws were checked in, we should do that first. How
> about checking them into the site repo so they get generated as part
> of the docs? Eg this is how Pig does it:
> http://pig.apache.org/bylaws.html

+1 makes sense.

> Thanks,
> Eli

View raw message