hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dhruba Borthakur <dhr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release candidate
Date Thu, 05 May 2011 02:20:30 GMT

I downloaded the bits, compiled and ran unit tests. Also, looked at the
source code to some extent. Looks good.


On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:

> On May 4, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> > The point is that these discussion should be sorted out, ie you don't
> > change your development and release model on a release VOTE thread,
> > you change it on a DISCUSSION thread.
> That is no different than saying you have a right to veto a
> release until the issue is addressed, which you don't have.
> A release vote is a majority decision.  If the majority
> decides to release, then whatever gets released will define
> the new norm by which policies are assumed.  If not released,
> then I suggest collaborating more on the policies before
> trying to vote again.
> Either way, we don't hold up a vote for the sake of a
> policy discussion because voting is a more efficient
> means of discovering if the policy really matters.
> ....Roy

Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message