hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Allen Wittenauer ...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting-
Date Fri, 13 May 2011 22:13:44 GMT

On May 13, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:

> On 05/13/2011 07:28 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>> If it has a modified version of Hadoop (i.e., not an actual Apache
>> release or patches which have never been committed to trunk), are
>> they allowed to say "includes Apache Hadoop"?
> 
> No.  Those are the two cases we permit.  We used to say that it was
> enough for a patch to be in Jira, but Roy clarified last year that
> committed to trunk is a better line, since that means the code has been
> reviewed and accepted by the community.


	So what do we do about companies that release a product that says "includes Apache Hadoop"
but includes patches that aren't committed to trunk?



Mime
View raw message