Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14339 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 17:49:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 17:49:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 92338 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 17:49:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92268 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 17:49:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92259 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 17:49:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:49:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of atm@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:49:46 +0000 Received: by qwe4 with SMTP id 4so3671908qwe.35 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:49:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.6.79 with SMTP id 15mr878295qay.168.1298051365362; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:49:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.228.138 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:49:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Aaron T. Myers" Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:49:04 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dfs.datanode.du.pct question To: Mag Gam Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cb06c885c40049c922242 --0015175cb06c885c40049c922242 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Mag, Per http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html, general@ is not the best place for this discussion. Let's continue this on the actual JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1564 -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Mag Gam wrote: > Aaron, > > Thanks for following up on this issue for us. > > Has dfs.datanode.du.pct been depreciated? > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > > Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1564 > > > > -- > > Aaron T. Myers > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > > > >> Thanks for the response. > >> > >> It would be nice to have a feature like this. It will make our data > >> nodes much more flexible. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Harsh J > wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Isn't this property a legacy one? 0.18 is the last release I see with > >> > this property. I've always used dfs.datanode.du.reserved instead, > >> > reserving constant space across all dfs.data.dir volumes. > >> > > >> > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > >> >> On some of my data nodes I have 2 filesystems. /fs1 and /fs2. Is it > >> >> possible to set the du pct so, for fs1 its 80% usage and /fs2 its 20% > >> >> usage? > >> > > >> > According to the release's code: No. > >> > > >> > (Unless two DataNodes are run off the same machine, which is not > >> recommended.) > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Harsh J > >> > www.harshj.com > >> > > >> > > > --0015175cb06c885c40049c922242--