Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9436 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 19:46:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 19:46:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 5646 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 19:46:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5386 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 19:46:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5378 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 19:46:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:46:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of esammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:46:38 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so1832094vws.35 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:46:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.186.195 with SMTP id ct3mr1120299vcb.57.1297453576743; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:46:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.5.80 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:46:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110211143735.38602fmir0zmqi3o@mail.cs.ucf.edu> References: <20110211143735.38602fmir0zmqi3o@mail.cs.ucf.edu> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:46:16 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba53a8968deb3b049c06f385 --90e6ba53a8968deb3b049c06f385 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I see these votes as a desire to simply not develop this code under the Hadoop project, not to kill the code base. I believe the general intention is to "clean up" the project so it passes the "do one thing and do it well" rule (or "develop one thing and develop it well"). Projects that are related such as fuse-dfs, mrunit, and so on should and must exist. The question (and vote) is simply should it be within Hadoop proper. I think they can thrive in the incubator or wherever the majority of active contributors wish to host it (although Owen has made the good point about visibility and community development features of the ASF). My (non-binding) vote is +1. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Grant Mackey wrote: > As a university researcher for file systems, having the fuse-dfs code makes > life easy when trying to run i/o benchmark apps. I would hate to see it go. > Here's my -1 > > - Grant > > > Quoting Nigel Daley : > > I think the PMC should abandon the fuse-dfs HDFS contrib component. It's >> last meaningful contribution was March 2010: >> >> HDFS-961. dfs_readdir incorrectly parses paths. Contributed by Eli >> Collins. >> >> There are 18 unresolved contrib/fuse-dfs issues in Jira, none of them >> Patch Available. >> >> Here is my +1. >> >> Nige >> >> > > > Grant Mackey > UCF Research Assistant > Engineering III > Rm 238 Cubicle 1 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --90e6ba53a8968deb3b049c06f385--