Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=holsman.net; s=google;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=fQAxj88E4ulq2sUxnDnWRJNE/1/lrDxWXGCOi1NuJ7QFPK2BWqpJQxHbwAM9qqAW1Y
         FOxVbLvadIfJnTX4pvT9AkPM5MVf0X0ioNYGfTTcTnKxNodpVOKF7NnBWW+UlLwJdjWq
         hVKLVQRgek8mieb+L4nwOnsLsve8bxUKUNubE=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib
From: Ian Holsman <hadoop@holsman.net>
In-Reply-To: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:33:55 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET>
References: <D97CF74A-147E-4573-B188-2F9C48CFC482@mac.com>
 <AANLkTi=F2eBsACBfjYSVava+VwFcsRpqZdRRN+OHXNRJ@mail.gmail.com>
 <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com>
To: general@hadoop.apache.org


On Feb 11, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:

>=20
> On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:24 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>=20
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Nigel Daley <ndaley@mac.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>> I think the PMC should abandon the hdfsproxy HDFS contrib component. =
 It's
>>> last meaningful contribution was August 2010:
>>>=20
>>=20
>> -1 we still use and are maintaining this.
>=20
>=20
> Who's the 'we'?  Looking at HDFS-1164 it looks like hdfsproxy was =
failing a unit test for 7 months.  This is exactly the reason we should =
thoughtfully consider whether it has a future within Hadoop.
>=20
> Perhaps Y! uses a different version of hdfsproxy?=20

They probably have patched it, and mistakenly forgot to submit them.. =
any chance of doing a diff on your version and submitting it?=20

Regards
Ian

>=20
> Nige
>=20