Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47324 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 17:36:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 17:36:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 2786 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:36:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2529 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:36:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2521 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 17:36:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:36:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:36:26 +0000 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so3228905qyk.14 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:36:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dOW6VGLdAkbelWrBZtCoyy7X3EwMbTuw4BAgiZUQOtE=; b=mkYgswduH2yN9Cv/PYlzwpJutoINwIj+NGL9RHAZyAbjnbeM+cYdpiUfXVqHucbTmu c1ZBh0m2XOuG63QYmbuQ59xA46FyHIgWj/OnasdKyQAa5BCMJB/KMAzU4tfhAGkyaNzu xSBk116+L7nThdx1b1DRexlMlU818N1etL71o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=trbwTGGNgVUn6X3Qm23iRgE09iOHTvQ0svwOUsfso+/cEEsTbbNKNVIxUtRTsnDUJ8 n1t8zXUkc83T4fNHg7BwzLAl0b6coWhpWI0+W1dEMd9fPoox9RT7ADLoCYO8Fq+prfpx WsZXCPceEy2c3r4qRKIl5/GZXZxd5qRUrv8BU= Received: by 10.229.110.10 with SMTP id l10mr918244qcp.56.1295026565303; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:36:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.188.69 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:35:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4A1492FF-C4B5-4949-B197-53B3A3B1BE29@apache.org> From: Tom White Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:35:45 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 to Owen's modified layout. The current layout means that every svn operation made during a release has to be carried out three times which increases the amount of work and the chances of a mistake. Cheers Tom On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote= : > >> >> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >> =A0Folks, >>> >>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on wha= t >>> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. = =A0Many >>> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a split= ting >>> headache. =A0I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of = that. >>> >>> CURRENT SVN REPO: >>> >>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk >>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches >>> >>> PROPOSAL: >>> >>> hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>> hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>> >> >> >> Moving the source trees back together is ok, but will cause a fair amoun= t >> of churn for those of us that depend on the git versions of the reposito= ry. >> Using Todd's hack may be able to fix it again at least for each individu= al >> user. >> > > Yep, I think we can set this up in a reasonable way with grafts. I'm happ= y > to write a little shell script we can put on the wiki for git users that > would make the history look sane. > > Depending on how the git mirrors work, we might even be able to get the > official git.apache.org one to work, too. If we decide to go forward with > this plan I'll talk to the relevant INFRA folks and see about that. > > -Todd > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >