Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82307 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 05:15:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 05:15:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 61728 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 05:15:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61545 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 05:15:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61534 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 05:15:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 05:15:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 05:14:58 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p065E4JG089230 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:14:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from lifthappen-lm.corp.yahoo.com (10.72.113.229) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:14:04 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Moving to a new namenode From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:14:04 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: References: To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) could you move this traffic to HDFS? thanks! On Jan 5, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > What is the correct procedure to move to a new namenode? My current > namenode is running on a 2 core with 4gb of memory. I am moving to a > new host, 8 core x 32 GB of memory. My question are: what is the > proper way to move to the new namenode, and what can I do to enhance > the performance of it since the new hardware is much superior than the > old one.