hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiller, Dean (Contractor)" <dean.hil...@broadridge.com>
Subject RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)?
Date Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:16:22 GMT
I wonder if having linux mount hdfs would help here so as people put the
file on your linux /hdfs directory, it was actually writing to hdfs and
not linux ;) (yeah, you still have that one machine bottle neck as the
files come in unless that can be clustered too somehow).  Just google
mounting hdfs from linux....something that sounds pretty cool that we
may be using later.  

Later,
Dean

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Ronald C [mailto:ronald.taylor@pnl.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 5:05 PM
To: Fox, Kevin M; Patrick Angeles
Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org; Brown, David M JR;
Taylor, Ronald C
Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into
the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)?

 
Hi Kevin,

So - from what Patrick and Ted are saying it sounds like we want the
best way to parallelize a source-based push, rather than doing a
parallelized pull through a MapReduce program. And I see that what you
ask about below is on parallelizing a push, so we are on the same page.
 Ron

-----Original Message-----
From: Fox, Kevin M 
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:39 PM
To: Patrick Angeles
Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org; Taylor, Ronald C;
Brown, David M JR
Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into
the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)?

On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 14:26 -0800, Patrick Angeles wrote:
> Ron,
> 
> 
> While MapReduce can help to parallelize the load effort, your likely 
> bottleneck is the source system (where the files come from). If the 
> files are coming from a single server, then parallelizing the load 
> won't gain you much past a certain point. You have to figure in how 
> fast you can read the file(s) off disk(s) and push the bits through 
> your network and finally onto HDFS.
> 
> 
> The best scenario is if you can parallelize the reads and have a fat 
> network pipe (10GbE or more) going into your Hadoop cluster.


We have a way to parallelize a push from the archive storage cluster to
the hadoop storage cluster.

Is there a way to target a particular storage node with a push into the
hadoop file system? The hadoop cluster nodes are 1gig attached to its
core switch and we have a 10 gig uplink to the core from the storage
archive. Say, we have 4 nodes in each storage cluster (we have more,
just a simplified example):

a0 --\                                /-- h0
a1 --+                                +-- h1
a2 --+ (A switch) -10gige- (h switch) +-- h2
a3 --/                                \-- h3

I want to be able to have a0 talk to h0 and not have h0 decide the data
belongs on h3, slowing down a3's ability to write data into h3, greatly
reducing bandwidth.

Thanks,
Kevin

> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> - Patrick
> 
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Taylor, Ronald C 
> <ronald.taylor@pnl.gov> wrote:
>         
>         Folks,
>         
>         We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis
>         onto a Hadoop cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop.
>         Figure eventually on the order of multiple terabytes per week.
>         So - we are concerned about doing the uploads themselves as
>         fast as possible from our native Linux file system into HDFS.
>         Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range.
>         
>         Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in
>         parallel using a Java MapReduce program would work fastest. So
>         my idea would be to have a file listing all the data files
>         (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and then use that
>         listing file as input to a MapReduce program.
>         
>         Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using
>         "hadoop fs -copyFromLocal <source> <dest>") in parallel with
>         all the other Mappers, with the Mappers operating on all the
>         nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file upload across the
>         nodes.
>         
>         Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there
>         better methods? Anything else out there for doing automated
>         upload in parallel? We would very much appreciate advice in
>         this area, since we believe upload speed might become a
>         bottleneck.
>         
>          - Ron Taylor
>         
>         ___________________________________________
>         Ronald Taylor, Ph.D.
>         Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group
>         
>         Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
>         902 Battelle Boulevard
>         P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33
>         Richland, WA  99352 USA
>         Office:  509-372-6568
>         Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov
>         
>         
> 
> 


This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the 
message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any
attachments from your system.


Mime
View raw message