Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45568 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 06:20:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 06:20:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 64744 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 06:20:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64597 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 06:20:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64589 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 06:20:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:20:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:20:46 +0000 Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so801995ewy.35 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:20:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.16.72 with SMTP id n8mr315455eba.38.1288851625055; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:20:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.14.78 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:19:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <33C92F80-1C08-48D0-AF52-162FF6BB0379@yahoo-inc.com> From: Alejandro Abdelnur Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:19:54 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop code reviews on ReviewBoard? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c3fce47c79d0494342737 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015174c3fce47c79d0494342737 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey Konstantin, have you seen how you can comment on patches and see side by side the changes in RB? It is quite handy. Alejandro On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > > I think the idea is to have issue/design-level discussion on jira and > code-level discussion on RB. > > This is exactly my question. Why do we need two places to have the same > discussion? > Even if the comments are automatically replicated in jira and/or vice > versa. > Why not choose one and stick with it? > > Thanks, > --Konst > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > Hey Cos, > > > > I think the setup used for Hive and HBase posts the RB comments to the > > jira which makes it easier to follow. > > > > RB isn't a second system for tracking issues, jira isn't a code review > > system, and RB isn't an issue tracker. I think the idea is to have > > issue/design-level discussion on jira and code-level discussion on RB. > > > > Thanks, > > Eli > > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > > wrote: > > > It looks very hard to follow. > > > I have really hard time matching jira and review board comments. > > > Especially when they interleave. > > > Why again do we need a second system for tracking issues? > > > --Konstantin > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Arun C Murthy > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > > >> > > >> I saw an ASF announcement that there's now a review board instance > > >>> available, it will be nice if we can try it out. > > >>> > > >>> > > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the > > >>> > > >>> I filed the following JIRA to see if we can use review board to > review > > >>> Hadoop JIRAS. > > >>> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3108 > > >>> > > >>> thanks, > > >>> dhruba > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --0015174c3fce47c79d0494342737--