hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantin Shvachko <shv.had...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Hadoop code reviews on ReviewBoard?
Date Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:15:22 GMT
 > I think the idea is to have issue/design-level discussion on jira and
code-level discussion on RB.

This is exactly my question. Why do we need two places to have the same
discussion?
Even if the comments are automatically replicated in jira and/or vice versa.
Why not choose one and stick with it?

Thanks,
--Konst

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Eli Collins <eli@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Hey Cos,
>
> I think the setup used for Hive and HBase posts the RB comments to the
> jira which makes it easier to follow.
>
> RB isn't a second system for tracking issues, jira isn't a code review
> system, and RB isn't an issue tracker. I think the idea is to have
> issue/design-level discussion on jira and code-level discussion on RB.
>
> Thanks,
> Eli
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Konstantin Shvachko
> <shv.hadoop@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It looks very hard to follow.
> > I have really hard time matching jira and review board comments.
> > Especially when they interleave.
> > Why again do we need a second system for tracking issues?
> > --Konstantin
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Arun C Murthy <acm@yahoo-inc.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote:
> >>
> >> I saw an ASF announcement that there's now a review board instance
> >>> available, it will be nice if we can try it out.
> >>>
> >>>
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the
> >>>
> >>> I filed the following JIRA to see if we can use review board to review
> >>> Hadoop JIRAS.
> >>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3108
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>> dhruba
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message