Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47958 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 16:10:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 16:10:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 62968 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 16:10:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62904 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 16:10:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62896 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 16:10:48 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:10:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:10:26 +0000 Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so3562993bwz.35 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:10:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.103.199 with SMTP id l7mr4565557bko.18.1282061404888; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.179.74 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:10:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:10:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Tom On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or HDFS > committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases where we > wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of simplifying > the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common committers as precisely > the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce committers. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen >