Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76350 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2010 18:19:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Aug 2010 18:19:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 87321 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 18:19:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87195 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 18:19:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87182 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2010 18:19:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:19:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.96] (HELO qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:19:47 +0000 Received: from omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.88]) by qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id voAh1e0021uE5Es59uKTWV; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:19:27 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vuKH1e00D2SbwD53cuKL3V; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:19:25 +0000 Message-Id: <62188BE8-B003-4169-A0A5-C718241FD3A0@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4C6C1F70.4000300@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:19:16 -0700 References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> <4C6C1F70.4000300@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Aug 18, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > +1 > > Do I understand correctly, with this proposal there will be no > common only committers? That is, there will be no committers to > common who are not either HDFS or MR committers. Correct. There haven't been any and there doesn't seem to be enough stand alone functionality in Common that it seems likely. (ie. a Commons only committer wouldn't be able to do enough to be interesting.) -- Owen