Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87674 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2010 15:36:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Aug 2010 15:36:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 39886 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 15:36:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39744 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 15:36:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39736 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2010 15:36:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:36:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.206.147] (HELO n20.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.206.147) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:35:57 +0000 Received: from [68.142.194.244] by n20.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Aug 2010 15:35:33 -0000 Received: from [66.196.97.133] by t2.bullet.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Aug 2010 15:32:34 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp106.mail.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Aug 2010 15:31:00 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 355642.23043.bm@omp106.mail.re3.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 19305 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Aug 2010 15:31:00 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1282145460; bh=MDOIX0v9EKeoU4tUOPI16wO93GZsFhGpxC+A7zLT2O4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=q7sahUiGhlhkhC7sKvNS8UcShN5J5pZ/eIzJc1VMgbwVGrBpDLjPIdpaDCbKb5pZ5LWa2a8YOuZkso5YP2/d8RNFeCzNiRi9py0DXYW3HzgGksS2CQ52qoJTXBOQ7xuGjO9rK99vOd0bawNRkF97IcxEGspmB9Li7r2jHCUpQwE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=E9wVrwqXGjerxeuGGwUOgVPnvrMnOjgaw4gHapQjrohGiddDRSZp9Ul/wWj5OrjC3XUCGTzQNJFddypx3HVmBpIHQdMcRmtPsQGET11SqGqO7CwzZ0letNQWGJE25WUyBissOQMQTAhKu/rWwWvDml+a3ehas6g2HgtSEyeGUTE=; Message-ID: <264147.15518.qm@web56202.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: zej5Q8gVM1mKt2XH_fbDLGj88SSgDvTm8HEgawgf3qjCFIm bzaYGCB2wtDMY3GE2ShbHMxLIl3gDQnDqo0ogLYBP_tRUSHVHEPVpxpcu7Xm EELCNPfBgAFPYERttLQMrZK3noZpfRRdsiDIRCydYILapjLdfT4uDM54Xk6w nEfWxyj5SezOB5hFcr..yPSBUU1LRrRQKr4c05imXArNuydj5WdR7ZXpdsLp QziavWcrAviopmH25rRKid5aiaJhNR_ub9pN41H7O7NqN.uh55SdCTBim5zg oC6bCTDh092J69aaFYMv7AzJV.OGZo6v4.gbUUxXomTqi0wVkfRZomLQluVP q6iNrFX60VlzRZcWlijtjlbtiJNB54uodCyI- Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web56202.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:31:00 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/470 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 References: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:31:00 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii -1 Most committers work on either HDFS or MapReduce in general. For the cases that contributors may provide patches on both projects, those people will gain committer accesses on both projects. For the occasional cases that some issues may require patches to be committed on both projects, it totally makes sense to find a committer on each project reviewing and committing those patches. Nicholas ----- Original Message ---- > From: Chris Douglas > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 3:15:47 AM > Subject: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers > > Per the discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/XkY > > Should HDFS and MapReduce committers lists be combined and all > subsequent committers on either of these two projects be granted karma > in the other?