From general-return-1967-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 16:08:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46973 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 16:08:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 16:08:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 60720 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 16:08:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60567 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 16:08:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60559 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 16:08:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:08:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:08:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31452B7D14 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:07:51 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ungrqCT7fxCg for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:07:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ABF3B7D13 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:07:49 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1282666057.38931@vkbqdBkLAHKXbfy4GLOH5w Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o7HG7bsg004692 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:07:37 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C6AB3C9.3050705@apache.org> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:07:37 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o7HG7bsg004692 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 16/08/10 22:38, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or > HDFS committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases > where we wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of > simplifying the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common > committers as precisely the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce > committers. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen +1 steve. Presumably this means I need to read the hdfs-dev and mapred-dev lists too ...