hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantin Shvachko <...@yahoo-inc.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers?
Date Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:59:12 GMT
+1

Do I understand correctly, with this proposal there will be no
common only committers? That is, there will be no committers to
common who are not either HDFS or MR committers.

--Konstantin

On 8/16/2010 2:38 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or
> HDFS committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases
> where we wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal
> of simplifying the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common
> committers as precisely the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce
> committers.
>
> Clearly, I'm +1.
>
> -- Owen
>


Mime
View raw message