Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29343 invoked from network); 10 May 2010 17:25:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 May 2010 17:25:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 47548 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 17:25:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47507 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 17:25:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47499 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2010 17:25:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 17:25:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 17:24:56 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Return-Path:X-OriginalArrivalTime; b=G80RwZi35dPlgi67DxFpRq62ekFRKbWP/TkF8FgMbj0vwWwKEihIiVFh udxcs64RghsSORg1QkNoHuy25xjLSVNb4YwFxD6kJ/gsPTanFvnvSR18j 0vfr8z+5WB5abtJ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1273512296; x=1305048296; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Hadoop=20support=20for=20hbase|Date:=20 Mon,=2010=20May=202010=2017:24:32=20+0000|Message-ID:=20< 7638AF7B-1C16-45C1-A9CE-025572A7E067@linkedin.com>|To:=20 ""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quote d-printable|Content-ID:=20<70802053-c141-4ee0-a4d1-e89e8a 0f8e32>|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20=0D=0A =20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20; bh=zhREF71k/NUzgjEa467g/g0zbB0RZITHd7ORHO4+jlc=; b=OUeCBVWjD+yc2QyYiZJOMNv7+V5UgvXU9iHcruKDYagCqdtqyaBd5pmb 4OdkQMsYd3d7LgSimePJr508Qa6Ng07TxA/Cn05yVUsPow8Zq6nRsCs9P MQlYUgeFmYI1MNi; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,363,1270450800"; d="scan'208";a="12797401" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.60]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 10 May 2010 10:24:35 -0700 Received: from ESV4-CAS01.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.140) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.682.1; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:24:34 -0700 Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:24:34 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase Thread-Topic: Hadoop support for hbase Thread-Index: AQHK7gugwCsp8tpMpUe2iaMIChehi5JKI4EAgAADD4CAAGtggIAAy3EAgAAFegCAAAG0AA== Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 17:24:32 +0000 Message-ID: <7638AF7B-1C16-45C1-A9CE-025572A7E067@linkedin.com> References:

In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <70802053-c141-4ee0-a4d1-e89e8a0f8e32> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2010 17:24:35.0000 (UTC) FILETIME=[A8EDCB80:01CAF065] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 10, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Stack wrote: > The above is a fallacious setup. How does a branch in 0.20 detract > from the 0.21 momentum (The append feature that we'd work on in 0.20 > branch has little relation to how append works in 0.21). There are X amount of hours that people can put into Hadoop. If Y amount g= oes into 0.20-append, then 0.21 is now left with X-Y. X-Y < X. >> I'd rather have the HBase folks put pressure on the Hadoop PMC to get 0.= 21 out the door than create a custom-to-be-thrown-away-in-less-than-a-year = branch. This way we *all* benefit rather than a select, but vocal group. >=20 > We're all behind 0.21. Its the future. Great. Start using the time you'd put into 0.20-append into 0.21 and then = we'll all be in a better place.