hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jay Booth <jaybo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] HBase as TLP
Date Fri, 09 Apr 2010 01:41:41 GMT
What if the projects were:

A)  split out to TLPs because they do seem to have reached that level of
individual community


B)  The projects could somehow jointly put out an integrated build
containing the above projects and let users run whatever they want out of

That would require a lot of coordination but would make a heck of a 1.0
release, if there's a reference build then it'll make it easier to
identify/fix cross-component bugs and the release process might surface more
of them early.  It seems like that could help with a number of St.Ack's
concerns about reanimated monsters.  Maybe it could be owned by the Common
project, with participation from the project leads?  Just an idea.


On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Alan Gates <gates@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> > I have a concern.  HDFS, mapreduce, Hbase, Hive, and Pig taken together
> form
> > a coherent software stack.
> ... if it had been designed by Dr. Frankenstein (half-joke!).
> I think it a stretch describing the Hadoop suite 'coherent'.  Pieces
> in the above stack can be swapped out and other components that do
> similar function put in their place.  Rare is the install that uses
> all of the elements above (and the above is not a complete list of all
> Hadoop subprojects).  Some of the components have inter-dependencies
> but others have no dependency on other subprojects at all and can be
> run w/o reference to other pieces of the Hadoop set.  For many, Hadoop
> looks more like a 'bucket' of software than it is a 'coherent'
> software stack.
> I'm trying to undo the premise upon which the rest of your mail depends.
> St.Ack

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message