Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4413 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 20:01:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2010 20:01:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 51818 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 20:01:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51764 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 20:01:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51755 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2010 20:01:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:01:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.26] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:01:43 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so772257qwh.35 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:01:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5GLkihGxcKEue1Y9k1cud7gEk/VYJyht4nbHgt/YOMc=; b=FiH7cCdf1IsMUKwb+wLgskwG+YM1lbcPy0TMhJP20FcVHzdVruC6xC//V14AslWqmZ JYYgyGFM4azHnUr/B2k5F/csFkAsxE0UR93xaxJ2C81vm4W0CCrVTv94/d0dSaper+8f pqPw0b3jQJYvjs5tlqsd1b+qAs+EMnTVADjBo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=dRjiok981DAWwcRVRvbYc/nsjeDOMeVczJaYE9zD1eqXc5nTqiOIlV2rrWhOOKHPE+ tJ+Qz5HpsLa1ZrBlXwbx4bXTpAjEniAQlVaAKpGR+/EYZ2Sw6ytbjElK5bcfg2esfzfs NA3fqWZ0Il2QCr14SV0g+dgcWYY25iAge4Wwo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.104.195 with SMTP id q3mr1674941qco.56.1269028881045; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:01:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <656B2F92-03D7-46AB-B49B-C8CBFE2F8BA9@speakeasy.net> <7c962aed1003191151g18b6efc3m5b89385ade5cc29f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:01:20 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: a1a9cb0034593512 Message-ID: <7c962aed1003191301q1f5ceef7ua0e30fec30ed3bb5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 0.21 Release From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Jeremy Davis wrote: > So what would be your (or anyones) advice on getting, HDFS sync/flush/append > functionality? > You seem to indicate that 0.21 branch as is might not be the best idea, with > your preference being a patch set against 0.20. > There'll be a hadoop release that ships with the working sync/append (In our testing, whats in the 0.21 branch+TRUNK, hdfs-265, works very nicely). I'm just not sure when. St.Ack