Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80160 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 19:29:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 19:29:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 79087 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 19:28:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79009 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 19:28:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78999 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 19:28:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:28:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:28:52 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so4913085pzk.2 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:28:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.62.34 with SMTP id k34mr6672885wfa.282.1266521311896; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:28:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7c962aed1002181054w3cdb9302y93f607f3b53f0d18@mail.gmail.com> References: <7c962aed1002181054w3cdb9302y93f607f3b53f0d18@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:28:31 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release plans From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Stack wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> Hey guys, >> >> What are the current plans for the 21 release? >> > Doesn't seem like there is much interest going by the deafening silence E= li. > > Did it come up last night at the HUG? > It did, Owen gave an update in his talk and there was some follow on discussion. The question of whether it makes sense to rebase 21 on trunk came up, since 21 has gotten really out of date since it was branched. What do you and others think of rebasing the 21 branch on trunk once security is feature complete next month, and then targeting an initial release a month after that? The rationale being that 21 branch is old, has not been getting the backports it needs, and the community should be releasing relatively recent bits. In the mean time we can focus on 21/trunk blockers. It doesn't look like there are a ton more trunk blockers than 21 blockers. I know people, HBase in particular, have been waiting for a 21 release for a while so delaying further is a pain, and we should consider rolling what we've got, the hope would be that the 21 branch would be more widely useful if it has more recent features and fixes. >> The roadmap on the wiki [1] says "minor releases are made regularly, >> every few months." The 21 branch was created 5 months ago, and the >> release dates in jira for the various core projects have all passed. I >> know some projects, eg HBase, would like to get users on more recent >> bits. What are the next steps for rolling a release? >> > > Taking a look at blockers -- assuming to make a release, we just need > to clear blockers and roll a candidate -- it seems like common/core > and hdfs have but a few but mapreduce has a bunch. =A0Too many. > > Does anyone detect activity in the blocker issues? =A0I've not made a > review. =A0Perhaps someone already has? A decent number of the MR ones are patch available and quite a few others are documentation related, nothing too scary. The core/hdfs ones are pretty doable. We should make another pass to confirm that they're all actually blockers. I'm happy to start working on the blockers if that will help push the release forward. Thanks, Eli