Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57771 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 19:08:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 19:08:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 16554 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 19:08:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16467 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 19:08:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16457 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 19:08:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:08:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.25] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:08:20 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so72968qwi.35 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:08:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=CdeBb/yPjpb9vv2Kc7zmf+3prhMLcEStXNn3h5+dGG8=; b=OQCPmFeJ/mkYxZ8rzBForOOgahWgeL8+jmhNoqa4LCqc/Puie5yLxRU4sDJINRTrmw MH3NZ7/9sxVafydTrOQ7Pej56DYeyaTcaruVu4ekJPAkNlivrHm7nT4W+Fd7ialoUdqw A8Qv/4sDjhzogYQywL07Myrr400l1Xs9ZZxc0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=s/IVXFFBO3GJSar1jVrKzHAbmX2NztfbSfbCdJNGar5+h9WFmq//ci5PP64vRQMzgq YvlwolEzDPuGyucnB4IJvpGy6vs/qNeBItFtEjxnf+wAy/GixweQlvJKC0OJco9mVWjA /9Sl+e49/H7rdxDvklZrNLYSlWdfK3WQ43Hl8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.230.84 with SMTP id jl20mr4980728qcb.88.1266606480208; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:08:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:08:00 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ddc1077375cf35de Message-ID: <7c962aed1002191108n76516c82q106e7d3e5aeb9428@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 I put up on a small cluster under load. Seems to work fine. Trolled logs a while. Nothing out of the ordinary. Checked docs. They look grand. St.Ack On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module: > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities > > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1 > > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4 > > Please try it out. -C >