Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42078 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 18:31:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 18:31:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 89895 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 18:31:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89809 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 18:31:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89798 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 18:31:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:31:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.197 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.197] (HELO mail-yx0-f197.google.com) (209.85.210.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:31:48 +0000 Received: by yxe35 with SMTP id 35so16013008yxe.2 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:31:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VL0DhsR7LYkiPrDsHGeMbA4FbIZBysf8s53Oxs3JMnc=; b=BT6lBtlgwKvoFkiLg02pqnhdAB2RBr/ZAmMxVHlyC6rAjvjxnVefN4Xcl4ne8LxvCe Lvlaf2gIWCX8WR8b9nbO8VoFwCzNycVuRgkjYbn04XWk+RSmfk4r6miFRd42/6EOdXdG /vwLggHY9MNkDpM4WvMg0oyCZ7RI6fJvhBTwU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=lGu+TEPmKmcShOLP/lnvovKgzHTkWyE0C2ZiAvT8BcOmT5dHLDLBh46GqTrYE2r5s3 iQ3Hk8dfoWYUkxnhW4qQFuMH+FBrjeBl3W4fKezmggrKjBfRYv7Go/F1Y9mhcHdBoK4q 9hlhEEMxFtBM/acyK+rwl6o5uZ+KDP2yVcAaY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.17.37 with SMTP id 37mr40284665ybq.285.1262802687470; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:31:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <80AB0612-128B-4C3D-8873-3E7CA072FA81@apache.org> References: <45f85f71001051129i176c7638ud173ceb82e6b61b8@mail.gmail.com> <8C97CCB1-3EA9-4A8C-9887-2CF4108E347D@apache.org> <80AB0612-128B-4C3D-8873-3E7CA072FA81@apache.org> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:31:27 -0800 Message-ID: <4aa34eb71001061031m56cf9065q586380342b81a5d1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 0.20.2 HDFS incompatible with 0.20.1 From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd757e29baca8047c832944 --000e0cd757e29baca8047c832944 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > I would like to propose that we pull out HDFS-793 and HDFS-101 from 0.20. +1 to pulling it out. This code is very tricky and is dangerous to change in a minor release. thanks, dhruba --000e0cd757e29baca8047c832944--