| Message view | « Date » · « Thread » |
|---|---|
| Top | « Date » · « Thread » |
| From | "Owen O'Malley" <owen.omal...@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project |
| Date | Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:08:13 GMT |
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Hemanth Yamijala <yhemanth@yahoo-inc.com>wrote: > Owen > > Some clarifications: > > In the section on "Code Change" when you mention approval as "Lazy approval > and then lazy consensus", did you mean the consensus will need to come into > play if a veto is received ? > Hmm... I copied that section from Ant's bylaws. Our current practice is probably actually lazy consensus since we require a +1 before it can be committed. -- Owen | |
| Mime |
|
| View raw message | |