hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dhruba Borthakur <dhr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Namenode with External Storage?
Date Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:22:03 GMT
The namenode uses storage to write file system transaction logs as well as
to write server-debug-log-messages. Both of these could be stored in a NFS
mounted file system, should work well.


On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Jonathan Seidman <
jonathan.seidman@gmail.com> wrote:

> Apologies if this has been answered previously, but I'm unable to find
> anything that seems to cover this.
> It's clear that datanodes require local storage for Hadoop to function
> efficiently, but is there any significant disadvantage to using external
> storage for namenodes? We're exploring the possibility of using a different
> class of hardware for our namenodes with attached storage and little or no
> internal storage. Some of the benefits this would provide us are: 1)
> allowing our sysadmins to deploy hardware that they're familiar with and
> already have considerable experience keeping up in a production
> environment.
> 2) no namenode downtime to replace a failed disk.
> We don't anticipate that this approach would cause any significant
> degradation to performance, but let me know if there's something we're not
> considering.
> Thanks.
> Jonathan

Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message