hadoop-common-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Retire BKJM from trunk?
Date Wed, 27 Jul 2016 20:23:51 GMT
+ Rakesh and Uma

Rakesh and Uma might have a better idea on this. I think Huawei was using
it when Rakesh and Uma worked there.

- Sijie

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Chris Nauroth <cnauroth@hortonworks.com>
wrote:

> I recommend including the BookKeeper community in this discussion.  I’ve
> added their user@ and dev@ lists to this thread.
>
> I do not see BKJM being used in practice.  Removing it from trunk would be
> attractive in terms of less code for Hadoop to maintain and build, but if
> we find existing users that want to keep it, I wouldn’t object.
>
> --Chris Nauroth
>
> On 7/26/16, 11:14 PM, "Vinayakumar B" <vinayakumar.ba@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>     Hi All,
>
>        BKJM was Active and made much stable when the NameNode HA was
> implemented and there was no QJM implemented.
>        Now QJM is present and is much stable which is adopted by many
> production environment.
>        I wonder whether it would be a good time to retire BKJM from trunk?
>
>        Are there any users of BKJM exists?
>
>     -Vinay
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message