Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 412A6187F2 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 01:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53500 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2016 01:07:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52630 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2016 01:07:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52602 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2016 01:07:14 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 01:07:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 827EA180A2E; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 01:07:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Q8cbfy11nOi; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 01:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f169.google.com (mail-yk0-f169.google.com [209.85.160.169]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 5C64F5FAEC; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 01:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id r207so70291950ykd.2; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:07:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MRNDfJTRB+ZjD+QhEEtUgwsL/HIT6h3FbNs+RnYY9Mo=; b=yxqsTfNLHQ7GuxoMJ2xPmqnBurTM4hzggnMRVE01tcnV3Hu6ghPizWaPS3/q274gKd +s0tCoMXIRipffOzvpjGli0zlZLXvZfwPXLSG5V+eQI2kKCqffQB+f2hJz5rbdUNUFVo c1gddRLbCBxSBSAzlHWUfbOsvWSDH6aXG0hznZhH1aIpNXT74BLeIRlEOjsctjWyYW9m maT6q2SwQuCpj9ss7d2NDbsSW/o3czZHi6THPFj04FehoQIHw2brrKxdG6QTg+lbZRcP H44dhcZ3GKZWIKUYB/QvqwA+NXe+Mx8lcHFDUFPxJpT4bFod+hWV8tbRHF3n+Mkbqwo+ 5oKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=MRNDfJTRB+ZjD+QhEEtUgwsL/HIT6h3FbNs+RnYY9Mo=; b=c/BuJSe5LB4ts32IXyjNfyxipRWWH7qpk5amAGzJBLQdaaYUwsobcTpBTYJuD/KsnD Tv+aSSzU0pRyheHkLhDxSAylMdrdTpKQBw461UQ7FcbV+rbybhMFf1lt2uyxJhpcEaLb 1DlJscsYl4UQPe4f8KKER+TAPZluPczileB4ONzkPaYLRUhwO65khEWA7gi87wczrUGk 6sdsymYIJjktwZTdzvyz28w/xgdvFi0S5xPTKjQdWW0SByj4Iqbr7Hddl81eqSn/SUFN 3mk4wqhdib7Rrm9R7JxHTQPV7zoaofWbBc1n0KkcNqI7364RALeAyuKxPgmIUcclgNqX 2BCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSTHKwIk55O+xU6RPlsLIrMnyCd4mUp7KSu0wIYQcWxF03U25Gh0AyIDhS6G8VdDBL+GsHsIAovLqLcLQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.37.93.7 with SMTP id r7mr5893647ybb.156.1456189623718; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:07:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.59.10 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:07:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:37:03 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: YARN Fair Scheduler From: Prabhu Joseph To: yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org, user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114239ec3f60c4052c659102 --001a114239ec3f60c4052c659102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi All, When YARN Fair Scheduler is configured with a parent root and 250 child queues for a big Cluster having total resource of 10TB and 3000 Cores. The fair share of a child queue is very less. Fair Share is Total Cluster resource / total number of child queues. How to design a Fair Scheduler with many like 250 number of queues in such a way, each queue gets more fair share. Is having Nested Queues or configuring weight or any other way to design. Thanks, Prabhu Joseph --001a114239ec3f60c4052c659102 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All,

=C2=A0=C2=A0 When= YARN Fair Scheduler is configured with a parent root and 250 child queues = for a big Cluster having total resource of 10TB and 3000 Cores. The fair sh= are of a child queue is very less. Fair Share is Total Cluster resource / t= otal number of child queues. How to design a Fair Scheduler with many like = 250 number of queues in such a way, each queue gets more fair share.
Is having Nested Queues or configuring weight or any other way to d= esign.

Thanks,
Prabhu Joseph

--001a114239ec3f60c4052c659102--