Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D559A17DC9 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:27:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44829 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2015 06:27:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44734 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2015 06:27:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44723 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2015 06:27:06 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:27:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C983C1A1947 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:27:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.9 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aofRlcVcewUt for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f177.google.com (mail-io0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 391C92055B for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iofh134 with SMTP id h134so155148054iof.0 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 23:26:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5bGIJfY2b+hHwUT9yxm8A+S9MixvR+GVYvsfGBTgHDY=; b=jCBQDZkf0S4BiOmZak433meHBogAwVn+ou01tPVWjzEzFGJIw0zjkLAdOQ3n6vOGky KX6OxQgN1g1GE2NeeKCR86dT52q7uKFRENgFsLvTKpiKaEfxje5ijhzf20uxj5sACvCi pT0wb5ixogzctfBK5GpiGXlYx1Tu2etvuNKPZ/W6NJeJ9l+w3PzHR3b8K4kifoL09W52 Q9IhWKE2aMhRcDWkrMGZseyukiy/kCdQ8VhWlSCPbcYITrcUh5GYA0X9poylA6N5frcP MauURHmlwk8VSYLNSUQNRjfMm/oRhOhsxFb2UE1pHBudxIbAN7mJejTKuF89hfaTezNo Fn2Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.138.21 with SMTP id m21mr24458670iod.115.1442212015572; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 23:26:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.48.80 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 23:26:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4394387A-8646-479B-A5E7-6D8E66DF998E@hortonworks.com> References: <4394387A-8646-479B-A5E7-6D8E66DF998E@hortonworks.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 11:56:55 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Update or Workaround for HDFS-1312 From: Vineet Mishra To: user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "cdh-user@cloudera.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ff978e10b68051faf26ab --001a113ff978e10b68051faf26ab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Anu, Any work around/ alternate solution for the HDFS-1312 till the time the patch gets effected? Thanks! On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Anu Engineer wrote: > Hi Vineet, > > Unfortunately we have not made any effective progress on that > JIRA(HDFS-1312). I intend to work on it and I will post a proposal on tha= t > JIRA soon. > Thanks for your patience. > > =E2=80=94Anu > > > From: Vineet Mishra > Reply-To: "user@hadoop.apache.org" > Date: Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 12:15 AM > To: "cdh-user@cloudera.org", "user@hadoop.apache.org" > Subject: Update or Workaround for HDFS-1312 > > Hi All, > > I am having a 10 node Hadoop 2.5 cluster with Cloudera distribution 5.3.2 > and the datanodes having the multiple disk partitions associated with the= m. > > Since the time its been observed that the disk space consumption in some > of the partition is growing tremendously while the other partition holds = a > fairly low disk consumption. > > In reference to the > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1312 > > wanted to have understanding is there any update or workaround to the > existing issue. > > Any quick/effective response would be appreciated. > > Thanks! > --001a113ff978e10b68051faf26ab Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Anu,

Any work around/ alternate solu= tion for the HDFS-1312 till the time the patch gets effected?
Thanks!

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Anu Engineer <aeng= ineer@hortonworks.com> wrote:
Hi Vineet,

Unfortunately we have not made any effective progress on that JIRA(HDF= S-1312). I intend to work on it and I will post a proposal on that JIRA soo= n.
Thanks for your patience.

=E2=80=94Anu


From: Vineet Mishra
Reply-To: "user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thursday, September 10, 2015 = at 12:15 AM
To: "cdh-user@cloudera.org", "user@hadoop.apach= e.org"
Subject: Update or Workaround for H= DFS-1312

Hi All,

I am having a 10 node Hadoop 2.5 cluster with Cloudera distribution 5.= 3.2 and the datanodes having the multiple disk partitions associated with t= hem.

Since the time its been observed that the disk space consumption in so= me of the partition is growing tremendously while the other partition holds= a fairly low disk consumption.

In reference to the=C2=A0


wanted to have understanding is there any update or workaround to the = existing issue.

Any quick/effective response would be appreciated.

Thanks!

--001a113ff978e10b68051faf26ab--