Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D44B116D2 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 10:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73780 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2014 10:22:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73664 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2014 10:22:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73657 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2014 10:22:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 May 2014 10:22:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of harsh@cloudera.com designates 209.85.213.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.172] (HELO mail-ig0-f172.google.com) (209.85.213.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 May 2014 10:22:48 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f172.google.com with SMTP id uy17so3271622igb.5 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 03:22:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=nha6KBnaqtF899IheAKkK0VR9ITwKMtjEakCoHf4adQ=; b=GrY3ZxYBje0dgPA40QzmFz7gBSzQWCT+89gx5KP/TyNA/6Kvs4Mhm7tuYqLroqP9PW IInIdCLCE32JJzY+ZLi11GFjFDPPNo1rROzXnOLt2AA8+MK6HK9BwNY2DcOvEbfZ6iii /rH0qeD9Q7epVLhxFqGXIjvcdr2eC+Z1SONCQ60mfFb8U6DhglKcDgcmwAY0KSHJPJMP rho5XUnNCKS5MPs18fspdvSHwUUNZuMAF9A2K7Fpiph0qRRTJsTt4qn5p0rzo0qaSHJh xYFoTuFBXFS5KC0EyMKTGwuqStQve8W/LSP10Q9N2QR/b6ShMCNbJALgW6Rg0xpTCdG7 Tj5w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmyoFnWA/cbCufkgMjvFF3b2p5SZ0RsVk+Q0boOUIzCLnJSB+/YMjM+jLx5K7aId7rqWWnU X-Received: by 10.43.53.73 with SMTP id vp9mr2120799icb.61.1400494948436; Mon, 19 May 2014 03:22:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.40.132 with HTTP; Mon, 19 May 2014 03:22:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 15:52:08 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: about hadoop upgrade To: "" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Backing up one of them is sufficient, but do check if both their contents are same and backup the more recent one (a mount may lag behind if it had a failure earlier, for ex.). On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:39 PM, ch huang wrote: > hi,maillist: > i want to upgrade my cluster ,in doc,one of step is backup namenode > dfs.namenode.name.dir directory,i have 2 directories defined in > hdfs-site.xml,should i backup them all ,or just one of them? > > > dfs.namenode.name.dir > file:///data/namespace/1,file:///data/namespace/2 > -- Harsh J