Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
From: "Pastrana, Rodrigo (RIS-BCT)" <Rodrigo.Pastrana@lexisnexis.com>
To: "user@hadoop.apache.org" <user@hadoop.apache.org>
Subject: RE: libhdfs v. 2.2 64-bit
Thread-Topic: libhdfs v. 2.2 64-bit
Thread-Index: Ac7hSSDLuKCOw6XcSSuO1XL7NNaDpgAObwyAAL8ZnvA=
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:06:09 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <54A8EF336FC15D4F946B9FE253F80F824F55A03C@RISALPMBXP002.risk.regn.net>
References: 
 <54A8EF336FC15D4F946B9FE253F80F824F559538@RISALPMBXP002.risk.regn.net>
 <CA+ULb+tD-hDQ4gtAEtRJQ3ZRjngY6SZMX0RirtKb_et5nD1fqg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+ULb+tD-hDQ4gtAEtRJQ3ZRjngY6SZMX0RirtKb_et5nD1fqg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"

Thanks Roman=2E =0D=0AOur app won't be able to impose any particular vendor=
's distribution upon our users=2E We grew dependent on base apache distribu=
tion packages w/ the 64bit builds=2E=2E=2E so is https://issues=2Eapache=2E=
org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9911 going to be rejected? In other words, are there=
 no plans to bring back the 64bit libs?=0D=0A=0D=0AAlso, since you mentione=
d the Bigtop distros, the last time I looked at them, they were lagging a l=
ittle behind in terms of distros supported=2E Do you know where to get info=
 on their plans for distro support and/or when they'll add support for Hado=
op 2=2Ex? thanks=2E=0D=0A=0D=0AThanks, Rodrigo=2E=0D=0A=0D=0A-----Original =
Message-----=0D=0AFrom: shaposhnik@gmail=2Ecom [mailto:shaposhnik@gmail=2Ec=
om] On Behalf Of Roman Shaposhnik=0D=0ASent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 11=
:46 AM=0D=0ATo: user@hadoop=2Eapache=2Eorg=0D=0ASubject: Re: libhdfs v=2E 2=
=2E2 64-bit=0D=0A=0D=0AOn Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Pastrana, Rodrigo (=
RIS-BCT) <Rodrigo=2EPastrana@lexisnexis=2Ecom> wrote:=0D=0A> So apparently =
the v2=2E2-beta apache Hadoop 2=2E2 tar file no longer =0D=0A> contains 64b=
it version of libhdfs as reported here:=0D=0A> (https://issues=2Eapache=2Eo=
rg/jira/browse/HADOOP-9911)=2E=0D=0A>=0D=0A> Does anybody know if there are=
 any plans to include the 64bit libs in =0D=0A> the distribution? Any ideas=
 where to search for future packaging plans? Thanks=2E=0D=0A=0D=0AFor packa=
ging needs you can either pick Bigtop distribution for your favorite Linux =
system, or pick the distro of one of the vendors=2E That will have all the =
native libraries built *exactly* for the OS you have=2E=0D=0A=0D=0AThe reas=
on native bits are hard to manage as part of Hadoop release process is that=
 you actually would have to build them on a the lowest common denominator o=
f Linux OSes (CentOS 5 perhaps) to have a passing chance of being compatibl=
e=2E And even then I've seen things like libssl break compatibility (which =
is not surprising since at this point there are deployment of Hadoop on Lin=
ux distros that are more than 7 years apart)=2E=0D=0A=0D=0AThanks,=0D=0ARom=
an=2E=0D=0A=0D=0A-----------------------------------------=0D=0AThe informa=
tion contained in this e-mail message is intended only=0D=0Afor the persona=
l and confidential use of the recipient(s) named=0D=0Aabove=2E This message=
 may be an attorney-client communication and/or=0D=0Awork product and as su=
ch is privileged and confidential=2E If the=0D=0Areader of this message is =
not the intended recipient or an agent=0D=0Aresponsible for delivering it t=
o the intended recipient, you are=0D=0Ahereby notified that you have receiv=
ed this document in error and=0D=0Athat any review, dissemination, distribu=
tion, or copying of this=0D=0Amessage is strictly prohibited=2E If you have=
 received this=0D=0Acommunication in error, please notify us immediately by=
 e-mail, and=0D=0Adelete the original message=2E