not at all. so don't worry about that.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Yanbo Liang <yanbohappy@gmail.com> wrote:
> It means that may be some replicas will be stay in under replica state?
>
>
> 2013/4/3 Azuryy Yu <azuryyyu@gmail.com>
>
>> bq. then namenode start to copy block replicates on DN2 to another DN,
>> supposed DN2.
>>
>> sorry for typo.
>>
>> Correct for it:
>> then namenode start to copy block replicates on DN1 to another DN,
>> supposed DN2.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Azuryy Yu <azuryyyu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It's different.
>>> If you just want to stop DN1 a short time, just kill the DataNode
>>> process on DN1. then do what you want. during this time, Namenode cannot
>>> receive the heart beat from DN1, then namenode start to copy block
>>> replicates on DN2 to another DN, supposed DN2.
>>>
>>> But when you start DN1 again, Namenode receive the DN1 registration,
>>> then namenode stop to copy the DN1's block replicates even if NN doesn't
>>> finish coping.
>>>
>>> Am I explain clearly?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Henry Junyoung Kim <
>>> henry.jykim@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @Harsh
>>>>
>>>> What's the reasons to make big gaps for removing nodes between
>>>> decommission and just down nodes?
>>>> In my understanding, both are necessary to copy unreplicated blocks to
>>>> another alive nodes.
>>>> If main costs of them are this one, total elapsed time couldn't be big
>>>> different.
>>>>
>>>> Could you share some articles or documents to understand about
>>>> decommissioning procedures?
>>>>  explaining is always thanks ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013. 4. 2., 오후 5:37, Harsh J <harsh@cloudera.com> 작성:
>>>>
>>>> > Yes, you can do the downtime work in steps of 2 DNs at a time,
>>>> > especially since you mentioned the total work would be only ~30mins
at
>>>> > most.
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Henry Junyoung Kim
>>>> > <henry.jykim@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> the rest of nodes to be alive has enough size to store.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> for this one that you've mentioned.
>>>> >>> its easier to do so in a rolling manner without need of a
>>>> >>> decommission.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> to check my understanding, just shutting down 2 of them and then
2
>>>> more and then 2 more without decommissions.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> is this correct?
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 2013. 4. 2., 오후 4:54, Harsh J <harsh@cloudera.com> 작성:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Note though that its only possible to decommission 7 nodes at
the
>>>> same
>>>> >>> time and expect it to finish iff the remaining 8 nodes have
adequate
>>>> >>> free space for the excess replicas.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> If you're just going to take them down for a short while (few
mins
>>>> >>> each), its easier to do so in a rolling manner without need
of a
>>>> >>> decommission. You can take upto two down at a time on a replication
>>>> >>> average of 3 or 3+, and put it back in later without too much
data
>>>> >>> movement impact.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Yanbo Liang <yanbohappy@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>> It's reasonable to decommission 7 nodes at the same time.
>>>> >>>> But may be it also takes long time to finish it.
>>>> >>>> Because all the replicas in these 7 nodes need to be copied
to
>>>> remaining 8
>>>> >>>> nodes.
>>>> >>>> The size of transfer from these nodes to the remaining nodes
is
>>>> equal.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> 2013/4/2 Henry Junyoung Kim <henry.jykim@gmail.com>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> :)
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> currently, I have 15 data nodes.
>>>> >>>>> for some tests, I am trying to decommission until 8
nodes.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Now, the total dfs used size is 52 TB which is including
all
>>>> replicated
>>>> >>>>> blocks.
>>>> >>>>> from 15 to 8, total spent time is almost 4 days long.
;(
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> someone mentioned that I don't need to decommission
node by node.
>>>> >>>>> for this case, is there no problems if I decommissioned
7 nodes
>>>> at the
>>>> >>>>> same time?
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> 2013. 4. 2., 오후 12:14, Azuryy Yu <azuryyyu@gmail.com>
작성:
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> I can translate it to native English: how many nodes
you want to
>>>> >>>>> decommission?
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Yanbo Liang <
>>>> yanbohappy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> You want to decommission how many nodes?
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> 2013/4/2 Henry JunYoung KIM <henry.jykim@gmail.com>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> 15 for datanodes and 3 for replication factor.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> 2013. 4. 1., 오후 3:23, varun kumar <varun.uid@gmail.com>
작성:
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> How many nodes do you have and replication
factor for it.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 
>>>> >>> Harsh J
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > 
>>>> > Harsh J
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
