Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39A56DD83 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60055 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 12:52:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59980 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 12:52:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59935 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2012 12:52:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:52:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of oruchovets@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vb0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:52:29 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id e21so3033912vbm.35 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 05:52:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=1TEX3WLyYyYl+kqDJhpr9MTaoUuOHWXWRvzSEjprBtg=; b=wRabiV4Z9bJNC6m5j8UnaT9M/B01GnOGywQzW2Nh1rdahfZzCgLNVDcIFZl3OQeckm wMFV4+vk1DhJ5t4q+Jt7gXzTZU6Xh/as+Tp0bTO4n975Rot4Vm9g8H/e1WGOPx8UwSgE UD8ePZj8eZNgMaDTYCJfXohmLClszJJZvzsdt2s+hJO5umLd9JfiwHxpyag4UOH1fBsy dHAZKVG6oFhMzgBMEA1O+bWRc4uXSH1jcEqCuYeiRw1w1r4iFvX/pBt1/AVWaYkgLrYF wc5W6oJGWRCprdF4Hr7w8YFVNX+yodSYr2MBIjr+/AF/9Lqm2uSVeGJ8WdS42IKgEzDO vKWg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.180.225 with SMTP id dr1mr24446687vdc.2.1351774328411; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 05:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.59.5.233 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 05:52:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 14:52:08 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Disks RAID best practice From: Oleg Ruchovets To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec517a990a9542704cd6e7caf X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec517a990a9542704cd6e7caf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Do you mean RAID 10 for Master Node? What about DataNode? Thanks Oleg. On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Michael Segel wrote: > I prefer RAID 10, but some say RAID 6. > > I thought NetApp used RAID 6 ? > > Its definitely an interesting discussion point though. > > -Mike > > On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:37 AM, Oleg Ruchovets wrote: > > > Hi , > > What is the best practice for DISKS RAID (Master and Data Nodes). > > Thanks in advance > > Oleg. > > --bcaec517a990a9542704cd6e7caf--