Return-Path: 
 <common-user-return-32998-apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10DAC9987
	for <apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:20:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 58369 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2012 18:20:36 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org
Received: (qmail 58282 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2012 18:20:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact common-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:common-user-help@hadoop.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:common-user-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:common-user@hadoop.apache.org>
List-Id: <common-user.hadoop.apache.org>
Reply-To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list common-user@hadoop.apache.org
Received: (qmail 58266 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2012 18:20:36 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:20:36 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of subir.sasikumar@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:20:30 +0000
Received: by yhfq46 with SMTP id q46so1113966yhf.35
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:20:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=LqbZ9rPs56YH+u7RoJdd/IxdetTPmVxoYUlPpwwM7Vs=;
        b=XAQYXdj/q2r4bM1DPQ3FcCHLrqpdOXLui+pQbrjmaahbx9OZ4ZHQy4GeVDpZsoRugQ
         j/ETBQb4/4UHkcklMhfogUPFQWhlvlInMsy1yY3ORbwsgbOS6XJAX/kegPNXuDIhxyM4
         4bRpZUHGm6p8YwVUK+KJRbqVCg/RA4FxoWBUk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.181.169 with SMTP id dx9mr3138492igc.46.1330453208985; Tue,
 28 Feb 2012 10:20:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.228.195 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:20:08 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:50:08 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <CA+m5d=wDfuBEmdkNya5+8Rxd90GswfWVbi0CvVDuP4PCP1QWZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Did anyone notice this benchmark comparison between HyperTable and
 HBASE
From: Subir S <subir.sasikumar@gmail.com>
To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae934040fe96ffa04ba0a46bb
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--14dae934040fe96ffa04ba0a46bb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Is this true?
http://www.hypertable.com/why_hypertable/hypertable_vs_hbase_2/
I dont believe completely, as it may be Hypertables marketing as well

Are there any benchmarks done by 3rd parties on HBase comparing other NoSQL
databases? Pointers?

Thanks, Subir

--14dae934040fe96ffa04ba0a46bb--