Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF6874225 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61909 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 14:02:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61851 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 14:02:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61843 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 14:02:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:02:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.32.181.183] (HELO CH1EHSOBE001.bigfish.com) (216.32.181.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:02:27 +0000 Received: from mail125-ch1-R.bigfish.com (216.32.181.171) by CH1EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (10.43.70.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:02:05 +0000 Received: from mail125-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail125-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562121708059 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:02:05 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -29 X-BigFish: VPS-29(zzbb2dK9371M542M1432N98dK14ffOzz1202hzz8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h668h839h61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:134.163.253.58;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPVD:NLI;H:mailgate-b2.shell.com;RD:www.additives.com;EFVD:NLI Received: from mail125-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail125-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1308664903680820_26170; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS011.bigfish.com (snatpool1.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.249]) by mail125-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762181BE8103 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailgate-b2.shell.com (134.163.253.58) by CH1EHSMHS011.bigfish.com (10.43.70.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.22; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:00:41 +0000 Received: from houic-s-03334.americas.shell.com (134.163.102.168) by houic-s-03326.americas.shell.com (134.163.102.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.254.0; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:00:34 -0500 Received: from houic-s-03344.americas.shell.com ([134.163.102.90]) by houic-s-03334.americas.shell.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:00:34 -0500 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: RE: Append to Existing File Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:00:33 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4E007DEF.9050601@u-mangate.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-topic: Append to Existing File Thread-index: AcwwBP6ogcY81Ko9Tbuxr/pFqehjdgAFo0tg References: <873521.50289.qm@web95907.mail.in.yahoo.com> <506607.491.qm@web95905.mail.in.yahoo.com> <4E00782D.7080906@u-mangate.com> <4E007DEF.9050601@u-mangate.com> From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jun 2011 14:00:34.0040 (UTC) FILETIME=[96DFC780:01CC301B] X-OriginatorOrg: shell.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I was under the impression the append thing was worked out as of 09? I guess I was way off -----Original Message----- From: Eric Charles [mailto:eric.charles@u-mangate.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 6:18 AM To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Append to Existing File Hi Madhu, Tks for the pointer. Even after reading the section on 0.21/22/23=20 written by Tsz-Wo, I still remain in the fog... Will HDFS-265 (and its mentioned Jiras) provide a solution for append=20 (whatever the release it will be)? Another way of asking is: "Are there today other Jiras than the ones=20 mentioned on HDFS-265 to take into consideration to have working hadoop=20 append?". Tks, Eric On 21/06/11 12:58, madhu phatak wrote: > Please refer to this discussion > http://search-hadoop.com/m/rnG0h1zCZcL1/Re%253A+HDFS+File+Appending+URGE NT&subj=3DFw+HDFS+File+Appending+URGENT > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Eric Charleswrote: > >> When you say "bugs pending", are your refering to HDFS-265 (which links to >> HDFS-1060, HADOOP-6239 and HDFS-744? >> >> Are there other issues related to append than the one above? >> >> Tks, Eric >> >> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/HDFS-265 >> >> >> >> On 21/06/11 12:36, madhu phatak wrote: >> >>> Its not stable . There are some bugs pending . According one of the >>> disccusion till date the append is not ready for production. >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:19 AM, jagaran das** >>> wrote: >>> >>> I am using hadoop-0.20.203.0 version. >>>> I have set >>>> >>>> dfs.support.append to true and then using append method >>>> >>>> It is working but need to know how stable it is to deploy and use in >>>> production >>>> clusters ? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Jagaran >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ______________________________**__ >>>> From: jagaran das >>>> To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org >>>> Sent: Mon, 13 June, 2011 11:07:57 AM >>>> Subject: Append to Existing File >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Is append to an existing file is now supported in Hadoop for production >>>> clusters? >>>> If yes, please let me know which version and how >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Jagaran >>>> >>>> >>> >> -- >> Eric >> > --=20 Eric