Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91210 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 02:05:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 02:05:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 56930 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 02:05:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56859 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 02:05:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56851 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 02:05:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 02:05:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rmorgan466@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 02:05:13 +0000 Received: by ywo32 with SMTP id 32so358007ywo.35 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:04:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BvXfhtZMtiJ7f/kzk14FNtR27aSqXPT/HzM9Nm3qnEo=; b=W6B5t5sejqLOIm7347Smy+SueHM9RjG6YBtEUTX2SkRDGGOEhTkCVVBwehwcbrvY5b N0hbxgaSujraqNs2g3dQ6Iuq79jvYZX+bthxRCQ3dXjJGXjpFsgeGoeOqZei6YMnlyRp KexTc7IB/2jamtSasPDcxtneAinBkgNw5yK4k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=c4LOtrf40VbKzt2CVwDi/vDWjtlF7YlRwXW5Tq1TZEUXekmxYcg995BrSV4ISE2OPP nP7Y1yZN7ZUtRQTqV6BVZTdZ+3xPiaPRfZTXUz+Rpx8a9FfqvV2pWncN4tZcNypb4Zqu J2ICM4rwNfAa5S4vlB6umLQyF5T2gk0y9wt8k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.22.2 with SMTP id z2mr163536ani.59.1301018692094; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.205.14 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:04:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:04:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CDH and Hadoop From: Rita To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: David Rosenstrauch Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504501755afd0a6f049f4504ab X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504501755afd0a6f049f4504ab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Oh! Thats for the heads up on that... I guess I will go with the cloudera source then On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:41 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote: > They do, but IIRC, they recently announced that they're going to be > discontinuing it. > > DR > > On Thu, March 24, 2011 8:10 pm, Rita wrote: > > Thanks everyone for your replies. > > > > I knew Cloudera had their release but never knew Y! had one too... > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > >> Hey Rita, > >> > >> All software developed by Cloudera for CDH is Apache (v2) licensed and > >> freely available. See these docs [1,2] for more info. > >> > >> We publish source packages (which includes the packaging source) and > >> source tarballs, you can find these at > >> http://archive.cloudera.com/cdh/3/. See the CHANGES.txt file (or the > >> cloudera directory in the tarballs) for the specific patches that have > >> been applied. > >> > >> CDH contains a number of projects (Hadoop, Pig, Hive, HBase, Oozie, > >> Flume, Sqoop, Whirr, Hue, ZooKeeper, etc). Most have a small handful > >> of patches applied (often there's only a couple additional patches as > >> we've rolled an upstream dot release that folded in the delta from the > >> previous release). The vast majority of the patches to Hadoop come > >> from the Apache security and append [3, 4] branches. Aside from those > >> the rest are critical backports and bug fixes. In general, we develop > >> upstream first. > >> > >> Hope this clarifies things. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Eli > >> > >> 1. https://wiki.cloudera.com/display/DOC/Apache+License > >> 2. https://wiki.cloudera.com/display/DOC/CDH3+Installation+Guide > >> 3. > >> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-security > >> 4. > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-append > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Rita wrote: > >> > I have been wondering if I should use CDH ( > >> http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop/) > >> > instead of the standard Hadoop distribution. > >> > > >> > What do most people use? Is CDH free? do they provide the tars or does > >> it > >> > provide source code and I simply compile? Can I have some data nodes > >> as > >> CDH > >> > and the rest as regular Hadoop? > >> > > >> > > >> > I am asking this because so far I noticed a serious bug (IMO) in the > >> > decommissioning process ( > >> > > >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-user/201103.mbox/%3cAANLkTikPKGt5zw1QGLse+LPzUDP7Mom=Ty_mXfcuoPhq@mail.gmail.com%3e > >> > ) > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > --- Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.-- > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- --- Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.-- --00504501755afd0a6f049f4504ab--