hadoop-common-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <tdunn...@maprtech.com>
Subject Re: benchmark choices
Date Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:35:41 GMT
I just read the malstone report.  They report times for a Java version that
is many (5x) times slower than for a streaming implementation.  That single
fact indicates that the Java code is so appallingly bad that this is a very
bad benchmark.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Jim Falgout <jim.falgout@pervasive.com>wrote:

> We use MalStone and TeraSort. For Hive, you can use TPC-H, at least the
> data and the queries, if not the query generator. There is a Jira issue in
> Hive that discusses the TPC-H "benchmark" if you're interested. Sorry, I
> don't remember the issue number offhand.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shrinivas Joshi [mailto:jshrinivas@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 3:32 PM
> To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: benchmark choices
> Which workloads are used for serious benchmarking of Hadoop clusters? Do
> you care about any of the following workloads :
> TeraSort, GridMix v1, v2, or v3, MalStone, CloudBurst, MRBench, NNBench,
> sample apps shipped with Hadoop distro like PiEstimator, dbcount etc.
> Thanks,
> -Shrinivas

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message